What might happen if a caller is not advised properly at the end of a low priority call?

When a caller is not properly advised at the end of a low priority call, several implications can arise that collectively impact the outcome of the interaction.

First, if the caller feels that their concerns were not adequately addressed or if they did not receive a clear summary or instructions, frustration is likely to ensue. This can lead to a negative perception of the communication process and can undermine the caller's trust in the system.

Additionally, without proper advisement, the clarity of the information shared may not be sufficient for the caller to fully understand the next steps. This could result in a delay in the police response, as the caller may feel compelled to reach out again to clarify their situation, potentially causing unnecessary back-and-forth communication.

Moreover, if the information provided was unclear or insufficient, it may necessitate re-evaluation of the initial call. This means that dispatchers or officers might need to revisit the call to obtain necessary details that were overlooked, leading to further delays and inefficiencies in the handling of calls.

Thus, failing to properly advise a caller at the end of a low priority call can lead to frustration, delay in police response, and the need for re-evaluation of the call. These interconnected consequences underscore the importance of effective communication in